Digital Logos Edition
Verbal theory is where the big debates about how languages function occur, and Hebrew is no exception. Driver’s Treatise is a seminal work on how the Hebrew verb functions.
With Logos Bible Software, this volume is completely searchable, with passages of Scripture appearing on mouseover, as well as being linked to your favorite Bible translation in your library. This makes this text more powerful and easier to access than ever before for scholarly work or personal Bible study. With the advanced search features of Logos Bible Software, you can perform powerful searches by topic or Scripture reference.
“allude to the distinction between order of time and kind of time” (Page 2)
“Gen. 15:6 והאמִן. 21:25 והוכִח. 28:6. 38:5. והיה (a uniquely-worded sentence, which can scarcely be before us in its original form: LXX αὕτη points to וְהִוא: cf. 1 Sa. 23:15. 24. 2 Chr. 10:2). Ex. 5:16. 36:38. 38:28. 39:3. Jud. 3:23 ונעל. 7:13 ונפל. 16:18 (might be freq.: cf. 6:3). 1 Sa. 1:12 והיה. 3:13 והגדתי. 4:19. 10:9 והיה. 17:38 ונתן. 48 והיה. 25:20 והיה. 2 Sa. 6:16. 7:11b והגיד. 13:18 ונעל again. 16:5. 23:20. 1 Ki. 3:11b. 6:32. 35. 11:10. 12:32. 13:3 ונתן. 14:27. 20:21. 21:12. Isa. 9:7. 22:14. 28:262? 38:15 (‘both’). Amos 7:2. Ps. 22:6. 15. 28:7. 34:5. 6 [but see § 58 note]. 35:15. 135:10. 12. 148:51.” (Pages 161–162)
“These tenses were formerly known by the familiar names of past and future, but inasmuch as the so-called past tense is continually used to describe events in the future, and the so-called future tense to describe events in the past, it is clear that these terms, adapted from languages cast in a totally different mould from the Hebrew and other Semitic tongues, are in the highest degree inappropriate and misleading. It will be better therefore to acquiesce in the names now generally employed by modern grammarians, and deduced from real and not fictitious or accidental characteristics of the two forms in question, and to call them by the terms perfect and imperfect1 respectively.” (Page 1)
“To the student who may be interested in tracing a particular use, the number of examples will not probably appear excessive; and others also may be glad sometimes to have the opportunity of judging for themselves how far an alleged custom extends, whether it is really common or only exceptional. Moreover, a rule is more firmly grasped when it has been seen repeatedly exemplified: and (as has been observed) it may even happen that, in virtue of the common point of view attained by the comparison of numerous instances, passages and constructions appear for the first time in their true light.” (Pages ix–x)