Gesenius' Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon to the Old Testament
- Format:Digital
Overview
Gesenius' Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon of the Old Testament is Samuel Tregelles' translation of Gesenius' Lexicon Manuale Hebraicum et Chaldaicum in Veteris Testamenti Libros. It is the predecessor of the Brown-Driver-Briggs lexicon.
Product Details
- Title: Gesenius' Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon to the Old Testament
- Authors: Samuel Prideaux Tregelles and Friedrich Wilhelm Gesenius
- Publisher: S. Bagster
- Publication Date: 1846
Reviews
7 ratings
' fill='none' fill-rule='evenodd' stroke='%23f9d200' stroke-width='3'/%3E%3Cpath d='M18.119 1l-.04 27.447z' fill='%23d2d2d2' stroke='%23f9d200' transform='matrix(.88484 0 0 .9304 1.968 2.223)'/%3E%3Cpath d='M23.277 30.15l-4.664-2.458-.006-10.878c-.003-5.983.006-11.49.02-12.24l.027-1.36 2.193 4.45a588.301 588.301 0 002.222 4.481c.015.018 2.48.387 5.476.821 2.997.434 5.482.802 5.522.818.058.023-.64.724-3.35 3.366-1.882 1.836-3.683 3.59-4.002 3.898l-.58.56.124.704c.068.388.489 2.832.934 5.431.445 2.6.817 4.76.826 4.8.01.039-.004.07-.03.068-.026-.002-2.147-1.11-4.712-2.461z' fill='none' stroke='%23f9d200' stroke-width='.041' transform='matrix(.88484 0 0 .9304 1.968 2.223)'/%3E%3Cpath d='M8.65 33.051c0-.02.406-2.41.903-5.314.496-2.902.902-5.292.902-5.31 0-.017-1.742-1.735-3.871-3.817-3.258-3.187-3.86-3.789-3.799-3.803.04-.009 1.911-.283 4.159-.61l5.275-.767c.655-.096 1.202-.188 1.217-.205.015-.017.964-1.936 2.108-4.264l2.082-4.233.007 5.878c.004 3.234-.003 8.56-.016 11.835l-.024 5.956-4.447 2.345a591.292 591.292 0 01-4.471 2.345c-.014 0-.025-.016-.025-.036z' fill='%23f9d200'/%3E%3C/svg%3E)
Douglas Ray
2/8/2018
Louis Savalla
7/28/2015
' fill='none' fill-rule='evenodd' stroke='%23f9d200' stroke-width='3'/%3E%3C/svg%3E)
Louis Savalla
7/28/2015
Peter Wise
2/10/2014
Pastor Brandon Gatzke
7/27/2013
this is the most accurate Hebrew Lexicon out there to the original language, this Lexicon sticks strongly to the Hebrew, and is numbered with Strong's depending on which edition, i also have the first and second in book form and it is authentic in translation to the logos edition. After using this Lexicon you will never go back to using strong's, and you will also discover that strong's is inaccurate to the original language.
Terry Lawson
7/15/2013
