Gesenius' Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon to the Old Testament
Digital Logos Edition
Overview
Gesenius' Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon of the Old Testament is Samuel Tregelles' translation of Gesenius' Lexicon Manuale Hebraicum et Chaldaicum in Veteris Testamenti Libros. It is the predecessor of the Brown-Driver-Briggs lexicon.
Top Highlights
“the seat of the senses, affections, and emotions of the mind, of various kinds, as love” (Page 427)
“that he spoke not his own words, but those which he had divinely received” (Page 528)
“The notion of unspotted virginity is not that which this word conveys, for which the proper word is בְּתוּלָה” (Page 634)
“(c) the grace, favour, mercy of God towards men. Psalm 5:8; 36:6; 48:10” (Page 294)
“to cause to bubble up, hence to pour forth words abundantly, as is done by those who speak with ardour or divine emotion of mind. Arab. نَبَأَ I. II. to shew, to declare, i.q.” (Page 525)
Product Details
- Title: Gesenius' Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon to the Old Testament
- Authors: Samuel Prideaux Tregelles and Friedrich Wilhelm Gesenius
- Publisher: S. Bagster
- Publication Date: 1846
Reviews
9 ratings
Verbum User
7/10/2024
The book itself is useful. The one start is to call the attention to the fact that this digital edition is full of typos. I have found, so far, 302! I have consistently reported them to Verbum with the "report typo" over the years, but I have not seen a single corrected, even though some of the reports were done 4 years ago. I wish Logos would take the time to correct the customer-reported typos, at least every 3 years.Sia Pauno
1/4/2023
Douglas Ray
2/8/2018
Louis Savalla
7/28/2015
Louis Savalla
7/28/2015
Peter Wise
2/10/2014
Evangelist Brandon Gatzke
7/27/2013
this is the most accurate Hebrew Lexicon out there to the original language, this Lexicon sticks strongly to the Hebrew, and is numbered with Strong's depending on which edition, i also have the first and second in book form and it is authentic in translation to the logos edition. After using this Lexicon you will never go back to using strong's, and you will also discover that strong's is inaccurate to the original language.
Terry Lawson
7/15/2013
