Digital Logos Edition
Few things are so vital to Christian life yet so mired in controversy as the language we use to name the mystery of the Trinity. By drawing on new developments in biblical studies, Soulen offers a fresh map of Trinitarian language that is simple, yet profound in its implications for theology and practice. He proposes that sacred Scripture gifts us with three patterns of naming the persons of the Trinity: a theo-logical pattern, a christo-logical pattern, and a pneumato-logical pattern. These patterns relate in a Trinitarian way: they are distinct, interconnected, and, above all, equally important. The significance of this thesis resides in its power to map the terrain of Trinitarian discourse in a way that is faithful to scripture, critically respectful of tradition, and fruitfully relevant to a broad range of contemporary concerns.
“In the 1930s, the Swiss theologian Karl Barth denounced the venerable practice of seeking nonscriptural analogies of the Trinity in culture and common experience as a betrayal of the faith, expressly identifying Augustine himself as a chief source of the error.” (Page 17)
“Ordinary and awesome at once, the name of God is something like an audible sacrament. In the name, the bearer of the name is present. ‘Blessed is the one who comes in the name of the Lord!’ (Ps. 118:26; Matt. 21:9).” (Page 3)
“The sacramental analogy is helpful, too, because it clarifies what divine names are not” (Page 3)
“the ordinary grammatical role of a proper name is not to describe but simply to point: this one and not another” (Page 3)
“Christians strive to the point of death to avoid calling God Zeus or naming him in any other language” (Page 2)