To many people, belief in the historicity of the early chapters of Genesis is anachronistic and at best, optional. J. H. John Peet examines the nature of these Genesis chapters and explores their impact on a range of fundamental doctrines throughout the Scriptures, including God, the Bible, mankind, and salvation—highlighting their vital importance. His study especially highlights the contrast between the creationist and evolutionist approaches. Special studies include discussion of the days of creation and the history of mankind.
“The second matter from the creation account that reflects on our Lord’s integrity is found in Genesis 2:2: ‘And on the seventh day God finished his work that he had done.’ Had He finished the creation or not? Did creation continue after that, whether by evolution or otherwise? Let us be clear that by creation we mean the ‘special creation’ of the ‘kinds’ of Genesis 1 (vv. 21, 24, 25). No new kinds were to be created as the work was finished. Contrary to frequent accusations, we do not claim that the created kinds were fixed and unable to adapt (often referred to as microevolution). We do, however, claim that there were no subsequent new ‘kinds’. God had finished His work of creation.” (Pages 35–36)
“Among all the activities of God, creation is that activity which sets Him apart as God.’1 If Mr Gilkey was right on this point (and would any dispute it?), what does the theistic evolutionary interpretation of the early chapters of Genesis tell us about God? Paul makes the same point: ‘For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world in the things that have been made’ (Rom. 1:20).” (Page 15)
“We often say that Genesis 1–2 is about creation. That, of course, is true, but this passage is even more fundamentally about God in His attributes and actions. Around thirty times in Genesis 1 we read about God. ‘God created … moved … said … divided … called … made … set … saw … blessed …’ Any discussion of the doctrine of God must start here.” (Page 15)