In the past 20 years, interest in the epistemic status of religious belief has greatly increased. Leading this revival are philosophers Basil Mitchell and Richard Swinburne, who believe that religious belief can be justified using inductive “best explanation” arguments. However, while Swinburne’s approach is formal, using the calculus of Bayes theorem, Mitchell’s is informal, based on his recognition of judgment as central to such an assessment. Probability and Theistic Explanation is the first full length comparison of these two men and their styles of justifying religious belief. The first half addresses the issues of rationality, endorsing Mitchell’s methodology; the second half explores the concept of theistic explanation and demonstrates that the ontological argument has a place in the comprehensive explanatory power of theism.
In the Logos edition of Probability and Theistic Explanation, you get easy access to Scripture texts and to a wealth of other resources in your digital library. Hovering over Scripture references links you instantly to the verse you’re looking for, and with Logos’ advanced features, you can delve into your study like never before.
