Digital Logos Edition
After a lengthy period during which scholars paid relatively little attention to the Pastoral Epistles, a spate of studies has suddenly appeared in print. However, except for a small number of commentaries, critical scholars have by and large neglected evangelical scholarship on these letters. To fill in this gap, this volume offers a collection of important essays written by evangelicals on 1 & 2 Timothy and Titus. The book aims to inform readers of the history of scholarship on these letters and examine thoroughly Paul’s theology in the Pastoral Epistles.

“On the basis of this evidence it seems doubtful that the early church would have been prepared knowingly to accept pseudonymous letters into the Christian canon.” (Page 6)
“Scholars who hold to the inauthenticity of the Pastorals stress that the vocabulary and style of these letters differ from the other Pauline epistles.” (Page 29)
“The errant teaching at Ephesus does not ‘exhibit’ (or ‘promote,’ Gk. παρέχει] ‘a stewardship in trust from God’ (1:4). On the contrary, the opponents’ myths and endless genealogies,’ (μύθοις καὶ γενεαλογίαις ἀπεράντοις) gives rise to contentious, competing speculations (ἐκζητήσεις, 1:4) which lead to unhealthy debates and wrangling (cf. 6:4, μηδὲν ἐπιστάμενος, ἀλλὰ νοσῶν περὶ ζητήσεις καὶ λογομαχίας). Their excessive focus on such topics draws attention away from ‘the faith’ and does not display appropriate loving relationships within the household (cf. 1:5, the goal of the παραγγελία is love).” (Pages 57–58)
“To sum up: the internal evidence strongly suggests the Pauline authorship of the Pastorals, and all views positing pseudonymity or allonymity face considerable difficulties.28 Contrary to widespread assertions or insinuations, it is not true that it is more scholarly and ‘enlightened’ to attribute the Pastorals to someone other than Paul, nor is such a position backed up by the best historical or literary evidence.” (Page 8)
“Carson and Moo is apt: ‘The Pastorals are much more akin to the accepted letters of Paul than they are to the known pseudonymous documents that circulated in the early church.’” (Page 8)