In this explosive book, Francis Schaeffer shows why morality and freedom have crumbled in our society. He calls for a massive movement-in government, law, and all of life-to reestablish our Judeo-Christian foundation and turn the tide of moral decadence and loss of freedom. A Christian Manifesto is literally a call for Christians to change the course of history-by returning to biblical Truth and by allowing Christ to be Lord in all of life.
“In other words, God in His sheer power could have crushed Satan in his revolt by the use of that sufficient power. B” (Page 28)
“Humanitarianism is being kind and helpful to people, treating people humanly. The humanities are the studies of literature, art, music, etc.—those things which are the products of human creativity. Humanism is the placing of Man at the center of all things and making him the measure of all things.” (Page 23)
“This concept was the same as William Penn (1644–1718) had expressed earlier: ‘If we are not governed by God, then we will be ruled by tyrants.’ This consensus was as natural as breathing in the United States at that time.” (Page 34)
“True spirituality covers all of reality. There are things the Bible tells us as absolutes which are sinful—which do not conform to the character of God. But aside from these the Lordship of Christ covers all of life and all of life equally. It is not only that true spirituality covers all of life, but it covers all parts of the spectrum of life equally. In this sense there is nothing concerning reality that is not spiritual.” (Page 19)
“Think of this great flaming phrase: ‘certain inalienable rights.’ Who gives the rights? The state? Then they are not inalienable because the state can change them and take them away. Where do the rights come from? They understood that they were founding the country upon the concept that goes back into the Judeo-Christian thinking that there is Someone there who gave the inalienable rights. Another phrase also stood there: ‘In God we trust.’ With this there is no confusion of what they were talking about. They publicly recognized that law could be king because there was a Law Giver, a Person to give the inalienable rights.” (Pages 32–33)
1 rating
Patrick
1/19/2022