Logos Bible Software
Products>Social-Science Commentary on the Synoptic Gospels

Social-Science Commentary on the Synoptic Gospels

$20.99

Digital list price: $26.95
Save $5.96 (22%)

Overview

The Social-Science Commentary series presents a pioneering alternative commentary genre that offers a contextual approach to the study of the New Testament, thoroughly grounded in the original audience’s first-century cultural setting. In this commentary on the Synoptic Gospels, the authors build on their earlier social-scientific work and enhance the highly successful commentary model they developed. This volume is a thoroughly revised edition of this popular commentary. It includes an introduction that lays the foundation for their interpretation, followed by an examination of each unit in the Synoptics, employing methodologies of cultural anthropology, macro-sociology, and social psychology.

Top Highlights

“Essential to understanding poverty is the notion of ‘limited good.’ In modern economies, we make the assumption that goods are, in principle, in unlimited supply. If a shortage exists, we can produce more. If one person gets more of something, it does not automatically mean someone else gets less; it may just mean the factory worked overtime and more became available. But in ancient Palestine, the perception was the opposite: all goods existed in finite, limited supply and were already distributed. This included not only material goods, but also honor, friendship, love, power, security, and status as well—literally everything in life. Because the pie could not grow larger, a larger piece for anyone automatically meant a smaller piece for someone else.” (Page 400)

“Older men in the Middle East do not run except in an emergency. Hiking up flowing robes in order to run not only lacks dignity, it inappropriately exposes legs to public view and thus causes dishonor. But the father does run because the son is in immediate danger from hostile villagers. He is not running to welcome his son, as Western readings would have it. By hastening to the edge of the village, the father preempts hostile village reaction, signaling by his kiss and embrace that the errant son is under his protection.” (Pages 290–291)

“In a society in which power brought wealth (in our society it is the opposite: wealth ‘buys’ power), being powerless meant being vulnerable to the greedy who prey on the weak. The terms ‘rich’ and ‘poor,’ therefore, are better translated ‘greedy’ and ‘socially unfortunate.’ Fundamentally, the words describe a social condition relative to one’s neighbors. The poor are those who cannot be given a grant of honor, hence socially weak, while the rich are the greedy, the shamelessly strong.” (Page 401)

  • Title: Social-Science Commentary on the Synoptic Gospels
  • Authors: Bruce Malina, Richard L. Rohrbaugh
  • Edition: Second Edition
  • Series: Social-Science Commentary
  • Publisher: Fortress Press
  • Print Publication Date: 2003
  • Logos Release Date: 2014
  • Era: era:contemporary
  • Language: English
  • Resources: 1
  • Format: Digital › Logos Research Edition
  • Subjects: Bible. N.T. Gospels › Criticism, interpretation, etc; Palestine › Social life and customs--To 70 A.D; Bible. N.T. Matthew › Commentaries; Bible. N.T. Mark › Commentaries; Bible. N.T. Luke › Commentaries
  • ISBNs: 0800634918, 9780800634919
  • Resource ID: LLS:SCLSCNCCMM01
  • Resource Type: Bible Commentary
  • Metadata Last Updated: 2022-09-30T02:52:46Z

Reviews

1 rating

Sign in with your Faithlife account

  1. David Anfinrud
    IT may provide culture thinking but I am not impressed it seems it tries to minimize many important Scriptures. I read the Sermon on the mount section. Though the goal is to look at culture only it seems yet moves to minimize God's Roll and Jesus Mission. Instead of adding the Sprititual thinking and ideas. It keeps it at Man level only. As Man is the only factor involved and God is not involved at all. I have always felt Matthew version of the sermon on the mount was the most important. Here ths so called thinking is that Lukes version is closer to the truth. Just bad feeling about the way the material is presented. What was shocking the most is teh way the Beatitudes were treated. using Poor as in money vice poor in Spirit and Religious thinking. I emphasis the Bible is the Word of God. This commentary does not appear to even come close but minimize God. Seems to follow some pattern of culture but overall I put it down as looking at the feelings of the people. and feelings of man vice the Glory of God and the Messages brought forth from the text. That is where I have issues with the writings.
    Reply

$20.99

Digital list price: $26.95
Save $5.96 (22%)