“Here is the case I am making: A crucified Savior can be preached in divine power only by crucified preachers.” (Page 80)
“But if the inerrancy view is sustainably the best view, the burden belongs to the inerrantist for gracious, sound argumentation, not only in constructing the doctrine further, but also in dealing with voices that have entered the debate, even challenging the status quo.” (Page 32)
“Inerrancy also accounts for the humanness and divine inspiration of the Bible. Precisely because the Bible is not only God-breathed but equally human, there is a need to say something about its authority since it has been touched by human hands. Inerrancy is a term that precisely does this, speaking of Scripture’s accuracy and inability to be eclipsed by the potential corruptness that would have naturally occurred in Scripture’s original writing.” (Page 45)
“Rhetoric is the professionalization of communication, and it works. But there is a problem: it’s all about self-display for self-glorification, and that’s where Paul draws the line.” (Page 83)
“Arguments made today from those opposed to inerrancy are similar and often the same as the previous generation’s critics of inerrancy, which resulted in CSBI.” (Page 27)
3 ratings
JS
8/16/2018
Justin Cofer
12/14/2014
Pastor Reginald D. Cole
10/6/2014