In this course, Dr. Sanders dives deeper into the theology of dispensationalism and how dispensationalists interpret the Bible. Learn about the importance of biblical covenants such as the Mosaic, Abrahamic, and Davidic covenants. Examine opposing arguments on the nation of Israel—whether the Church replaces Israel and receives its promises, or whether Israel is distinct from the Church and will experience restoration in the future. Explore different ways of interpreting prophecy and eschatology and how our culture has been greatly impacted as a result.
“But He gives them circumcision as a sign of the covenant. It’s a sign of the covenant. But notice it’s not really a condition of the covenant. God had made the covenant long before that, and indeed in the nt Paul, when talking about Abraham’s conversion—his coming to faith in God—refers to the fact that his coming to faith took place before even the circumcision sign was added. So circumcision is added as a separate thing—separate from the covenant—not really a condition, I think.” (source)
“For the most part, I think evangelical interpreters are agreed that the Mosaic covenant fits in that first category—the suzerain-vassal kind of treaty. It seems to have a very similar form. It at least is that kind of a treaty, while the unilateral covenants seem to flow into things like the Abrahamic, the Davidic, and the new covenant.” (source)
“The first is the suzerain-vassal covenant. This is a treaty between two parties where one is normally in a stronger position, and the other maybe is in a weaker position, but there is an obligation on both sides.” (source)
“On the one hand, we can make this point: that the Mosaic Law, itself, doesn’t divide neatly into those three categories.” (source)
“He also calls it historical-grammatical interpretation.” (source)