The Resurrection of the Dead
Overview
Karl Barth saw Chapter 15 as the center of 1 Corinthians, arguing that a misunderstanding of the resurrection underlies all the problems in Corinth. In this volume, he develops his view of biblical eschatology, asserting that chapter 15 is key to understanding the testimony of the New Testament. Barth understood the “last things” not as an end to history but as an “end-history” with which any period is faced.
Get Barth's Church Dogmatics, this title, and more with the Karl Barth Collection (49 vols.).
Key Features
- Featues a key title from Karl Barth
- Examines an important topic from a Reformed twentieth-century perspective
- Provides biblical exegesis combined with deep concern for theological orthodoxy'
Top Highlights
“It is not truth that is threatened, but men in their relation to truth” (Page 126)
“God always remains the subject in the relationship created by this testimony. He is not transformed into the object, into man’s having the right to the last word: otherwise it is no longer this testimony, this relationship.” (Page 16)
“nothing accidental and peripheral, but the foundation and the centre, by virtue of which they are Christians” (Page 125)
“and even the angels, to test and distinguish spirits, to recognize” (Page 29)
“The dead: that is what we are. The risen: that is what we are not.” (Page 108)
- Title: The Resurrection of the Dead
- Author: Karl Barth
- Publisher: Wipf and Stock
- Print Publication Date: 2003
- Logos Release Date: 2015
- Pages: 233
- Language: English
- Resources: 1
- Format: Digital › Logos Research Edition
- Subjects: Jesus Christ › Resurrection; Bible. N.T. 1 Corinthians 15 › Commentaries; Resurrection
- ISBNs: 9781592443833, 1592443834
- Resource ID: LLS:RSRRCTNDD
- Resource Type: Monograph
- Metadata Last Updated: 2022-09-30T02:47:53Z
Karl Barth (May 10, 1886–December 10, 1968) was a twentieth-century Swiss theologian in the Reformed tradition. A vigorous opponent of theological liberalism and modernism, he is sometimes called “the Father of Neo-Orthodoxy.”
