OT366 Book Study: Daniel and Its Literary and Historical Contexts introduces you to the content and structure of the book of Daniel, as well as its literary and historical contexts. Dr. Wendy Widder navigates the many interpretive issues and complexities of critical scholarship in Daniel and presents them in a fair, concise, and accessible way, providing much clarity to what can often be a mystifying book. You’ll learn how the original audience would have understood the book in light of the historical events of the time period in which it was written and see how its theological message—originally intended for the Israelites—is extended to believers today, providing hope amid the brokenness of life and highlighting God’s sovereign rule over His eternal and indestructible kingdom.
“The overwhelming theology of the book of Daniel is the sovereignty of God and His continuing care for His people.” (source)
“God’s people are in exile in Babylon. In a discussion on the book of Ezekiel, who was a prophet of the exile, ot scholar Daniel Block describes the effect of exile on God’s people as an intense condition of theological shock. This theological shock resulted from their devastated sense of security as God’s people. They had always assumed that Yahweh was obligated to rescue them, and yet they had landed in exile.” (source)
“I like what Sims says in Ryken [and] Longman’s Complete Literary Guide to the Bible. He says, whatever their motivation, ‘the greater issue theologically is that of divine nurture versus human nurture—on whom or what will the Hebrews rely for sustenance in their captivity?’ Who will sustain them? Eating just vegetables should not have been the means to their greater strength. This chapter isn’t giving us a diet plan; it’s presenting theological truth. Where is the source of your life and sustenance found? And this is an important way to open the book. Why is not really the question. Who is the issue and how Daniel behaved.” (source)
“In the ancient Near East, kings fought on behalf of their gods, and to the victor went the spoils. So, on the surface in these two verses, the relocation of the vessels of the temple show the winner. Nebuchadnezzar and his god had won. But the narrator won’t let you really think that. Three times in the entire chapter, beginning in this verse, he says, ‘God gave.’ He gives us a glimpse of what’s going on behind the scenes; what’s really happening. This is a central theme of the chapter and throughout the book. We have the God of Israel versus a human king and the god he represents.” (source)