“The Catholic Church doesn’t create dogmas with utter disregard for Scripture (quite the contrary). Calvin fails to document what he charges. We make no such dichotomy. Calvin does because he thinks in ‘either/or’ terms: for him, if there is true Church authority, this must somehow inexorably be opposed to Scripture in some essential fashion. It’s simply not true.” (Page 16)
“Catholics do not do this. Scripture often points to traditions outside of itself that are true. Therefore, to hold such a view is not to hold to a ‘mutilated and incomplete’ Bible. It is to hold to all that the Bible itself asserts. The one who denies that there is such a thing as a tradition described and fully accepted in Scripture, is selectively disbelieving part of that same Scripture. It isn’t being accepted in its totality.” (Page 16)
“Individuals can far more easily (wrongly) declare that their view is the ‘biblical’ one. Calvin does this all the time. I do it myself (most people who do any theology at all, do it), but the difference is that we Catholics submit our judgments to that of the Church, and where we differ from the Church, we submit to her, even if we may not always fully understand.” (Page 18)
“Again, we must, therefore, change Scripture so that it is more agreeable to Calvin’s eucharistic teachings:” (Page 221)
“There are true and false traditions. Protestants too often condemn all ‘traditions,’ as if they have none, and as if there are no true traditions described and sanctioned in Holy Scripture.” (Page 18)