Ebook
The evil-god challenge is one of the most popular topics in contemporary philosophy of religion. In this landmark text, Jack Symes offers the most detailed examination of the challenge to date. Exploring the nature of god through the leading schools of philosophical theology, Symes argues that it is significantly more reasonable to attribute goodness to god than evil. Drawing from a breadth of ground-breaking material – in metaphysics, ethics, aesthetics and epistemology – Symes claims to defeat the evil-god challenge on behalf of traditional theism.
Is it any more reasonable to believe in a good god than an evil god? Not according to proponents of the evil-god challenge. After all, the world contains a significant amount of good and evil for which either god could be held responsible. However, if belief in both gods is equally as reasonable, then religious believers are unjustified in favouring one hypothesis over the other. Therefore, in order to defend their faith, theists must respond to the evil-god challenge: the question of what justifies belief in good god over evil god.
Examines the evil-god problem through three lenses of philosophical theology.
Responds and sets out a compelling solution to the evil-god challenge
Examines the problem through three lenses of philosophical theology
Develops a range of asymmetries that serve to undermine the symmetry thesis in favour of good god
List of Figures
Preface
Acknowledgements
Introduction
1. Constructing the Challenge
2. The Greatest Conceivable Being
3. The Bloody Watchmaker
4. God Revealed
Conclusion
Notes & Sources
Bibliography
Index
This is the most thorough treatment of the widely-discussed evil-god challenge to date. Symes clearly identifies the strongest version of the challenge and then patiently constructs a robust response, showing how the three main approaches to theology strongly favour attributing goodness rather than evil to god. Required reading for anyone interested in the topic.
In recent years, the evil-god challenge has become a highly debated topic in the philosophy of religion. Defeating the Evil-God Challenge by Jack Symes stands as a pioneering, comprehensive exploration of this contentious subject, providing both depth and intrigue. It not only marks a pivotal milestone in the field but also serves as a must-read for theists, atheists, and anyone navigating the expansive intellectual landscape in between.
Suppose that there is a God, is it more (or at least as) likely that He's bad as it is that He's good? Arguments that the answer to this question is 'Yes' constitute the evil-god challenge as it has been pressed over the last decade. In this, the first book-length engagement with the challenge, Symes makes a sustained, careful, and multi-pronged case that the answer is in fact 'No', a case which will be of cogency and interest to theists, agnostics and atheists alike.
Symes' book – the first book on the evil-god challenge to date – provides a clear and concise overview of key arguments and thinkers. It's a great place to start.
Engagingly written and accessible, Defeating the Evil-God Challenge provides a novel and compelling response to an important argument against the existence of the God of classical monotheism. This book is a must-read for any scholar interested in the fundamental questions of God's existence and nature.
Jack Symes is a public philosopher and writer. He is the producer of The Panpsycast Philosophy Podcast and editor of the Bloomsbury series Talking about Philosophy. He is currently Teacher and Researcher at Durham University, UK.