Themelios is an international evangelical theological journal that expounds and defends the historic Christian faith. Its primary audience is theological students and pastors, though scholars read it as well. It was formerly a print journal operated by RTSF/UCCF in the United Kingdom, and it became a digital journal operated by The Gospel Coalition in 2008. The new editorial team, led by D.A. Carson, seeks to preserve representation, in both essayists and reviewers, from both sides of the Atlantic. Each issue contains articles on important theological themes, as well as book reviews and discussion—from the most important evangelical voices of our time.
“the Father also, in his love for the Son, must be understood to suffer in the event of the cross” (Page 11)
“was not trying to write a definitive systematic theology for all time.” (Page 5)
“The first of these is that charismatic gifts continued only till the church was established and out of danger. They therefore decreased throughout the first few centuries and halted in the fourth or fifth (a theory which participants in the charismatic movement would take issue with). The other view centres particularly upon miracles and gifts of revelation (prophecy, tongues, the word of wisdom, the word of knowledge) and states that these were only operative in connection with the apostles.” (Page 20)
“The idea of divine impassibility (apatheia) was a Greek philosophical inheritance in early Christian theology. The great hellenistic Jewish theologian Philo had already prepared the way for this by making apatheia a prominent feature of his understanding of the God of Israel,20 and virtually all the Christian Fathers took it for granted, viewing with suspicion any theological tendency which might threaten the essential impassibility of the divine nature.” (Page 7)
“Classical Pentecostalism has always pointed to speaking in tongues as the ‘initial evidence’ that an individual has received baptism in the Spirit. However, many participants in the charismatic movement have found this emphasis upon tongues disturbing and do not agree that every person baptized in the Spirit is able to speak in tongues nor that they should expect to do so.” (Page 17)